A Dragon in Sheep’s Clothing

Christianity and democracy go hand in hand.  In fact, true democracy is the child of Christianity.  Both emphasize the dignity of the individual.  Both make the person to be more important than the state. The rights and powers of the central government are given to it by the people.  The state is for the citizens, not the citizens for the state.

….

The great danger to our civilization comes not when subversive movements appear — but only when our people relinquish their former ideals, disavow their former beliefs, and accept the new philosophical ideology!

….

The real difficulty today is that the higher, nobler, worth-while things of life have been taken away from us.  We have relinquished them and have received nothing to replace them.

….

The twentieth century has made much progress scientifically, hygienically, mechanically, and materially.  But — while doing so we have surrendered our basic beliefs, relinquished our cherished ideals, seared our modern consciences, and well-nigh damned our immortal souls.

From a series of radio messages, “Showers of Blessing,” by Rev. Russel V. DeLong. Originally published in 1954.

“Your Hands”

By Kate Herzig, JJ and David Heller
Sung by JJ Heller

I have unanswered prayers
I have trouble I wish wasn’t there
And I have asked a thousand ways
That you would take my pain away
You would take my pain away

I am trying to understand
How to walk this weary land
Make straight the paths that crooked lie
Oh Lord, before these feet of mine
Oh Lord, before these feet of mine

When my world is shaking, heaven stands
When my heart is breaking
I never leave your hands

When you walked upon the earth
You healed the broken, lost and hurt
I know you hate to see me cry
One day you will set all things right
Yeah, one day you will set all things right

When my world is shaking, heaven stands
When my heart is breaking
I never leave your hands

Your hands that shaped the world
Are holding me
They hold me still

“Your Hands” is song #10:

Why is no one talking about this?

Did you know that an illegal immigrant can, after becoming a legal immigrant, claim work done in the U.S. while they were still “illegal?” I only became aware of this when I saw the following headline from The Washington Times, 5/18/2010:

Illegals granted Social Security

The Senate voted yesterday to allow illegal aliens to collect Social Security benefits based on past illegal employment — even if the job was obtained through forged or stolen documents.

The following is from Tim Chapman, Director of the Center for Media and Public Policy at The Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C., before the vote (emphasis mine):

To qualify for full Social Security benefits, a worker must register 10 years of work. Under current law, illegal immigrants who obtain legal status can use their previous illegal work history to apply for Social Security benefits.

A compromise immigration bill pending right now in the U.S. Senate (sponsored by Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and Mel Martinez (R-FL)) comes at a time when our nation is facing an enormous crisis on the entitlements front. A recent report moved the year in which Social Security will go broke from 2041 to 2040. Congress cannot afford to keep the promise of Social Security to its own citizens, let alone illegal workers.

To remedy the situation, Sen. John Ensign (R-NV) has offered an amendment to the pending Senate immigration bill that would reverse this law to ensure that law-breakers are not rewarded for their past work at the expense of immigrants who have waited in line and American citizens.

Of all people, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) voted against the amendment, saying that it wouldn’t be fair to wipe out the “nest eggs” of currently legal immigrants who have already accumulated benefits from illegal work completed before they were authorized to work in the U.S.

Excuse me? Why should illegal work mean you’re entitled to anything? If you get a job with a stolen Social Security number, you should get jail time, not benefits.

Consider this scenario: a man who is a full U.S. citizen — born here and never a citizen of another country — wants to get a new identity (for whatever reason). He gets a job using a stolen Social Security number and forged and stolen documents. If he is caught, would he be prosecuted?

If the answer is yes, then any illegal alien who obtains work, loans, bank accounts, or any other benefit using the same stolen Social Security number and forged/stolen documents should be prosecuted.

Besides, the legal ramifications are spelled out when you sign forms for work, bank accounts, etc. — that by signing your name, you are attesting to the truth of the information you have provided. Usually, you are also agreeing to abide by the company’s right to fire you and close your accounts if they find that you provided false information, and not to hold the company liable for damages as a result of providing false information.

But back to the bill amendment…

I did some searching, and here’s a good summary of the amendment and vote (the original post is no longer online):

Just a few minutes ago, on the floor of the United States Senate, senators debated an amendment to the McCain immigration bill.

This is not, by itself, profanity-inducing.

But here’s the substance of the debate– Should ILLEGAL immigrants, once made legal by the McCain legislation, be entitled to receive the Social Security benefits they have paid into the system while ILLEGALLY using FRAUDULENT Social Security numbers STOLEN from actual, legal citizens of the United States of America.

The fact that this is even up for debate is just beyond insane. Everyone knows we will never have enough Social Security funds to serve, you know, actual citizens.

Every single one of those senators knows that, and they’re debating whether we should extend such non-existent, unsustainable, budget-busting, generation-saddling benefits to millions of people who fraudulently entered the system by stealing the identities (and sometimes ruining the credit) of legal Americans?!?

Sen. Ensign, God bless him, offered an amendment suggesting illegals should not be eligible for Social Security benefits accrued while illegal.

The U.S. Senate voted to kill that amendment, 50-49.

I can think of no better response to this than this quote written in 1919 by President Theodore Roosevelt:

We should insist that if the immigrant who comes here does in good faith become an American and assimilates himself to us he shall be treated on an exact equality with every one else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed or birth-place or origin.

But this is predicated upon the man’s becoming in very fact an American and nothing but an American. ….There can be no divided allegiance here. . . We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language, for we intend to see that the crucible turns our people out as Americans, of American nationality, and not as dwellers in a polyglot boarding-house; and we have room for but one soul loyalty, and that is loyalty to the American people.

In contrast, Massachusetts seems to be following the letter of the law by not allowing illegal immigrants (or the companies who support them) any more leniency than they would American citizens caught in the same felonies. (To compare again, think what would happen if a company was found to knowingly and regularly hire U.S. citizens with false identities and forged papers. Both the individuals and the company would likely face prosecution or penalties.)

From the Boston Globe, 5/27/2010:

With one lawmaker citing President Lincoln’s respect for the rule of law, the Massachusetts Senate passed a far-reaching crackdown this afternoon on illegal immigrants and those who would hire them, going further, senators said, than any immigration bill proposed over the past five years.

In a surprising turn of events, the legislation replaced a narrower bill that was passed Wednesday over the objections of Republicans.

The measure, which passed on a 28-10 vote as an amendment to the budget, would bar the state from doing business with any company found to break federal laws barring illegal immigrant hiring. It would also toughen penalties for creating or using fake identification documents, and explicitly deny in-state college tuition for illegal immigrants.

The amendment would also require the state’s public health insurance program to verify residency through the Department of Homeland Security, and would require the state to give legal residents priority for subsidized housing.

If there are “federal laws barring illegal immigrant hiring,” why is the U.S. Senate voting to reward illegal aliens who got away with it?